page 1
page 2
page 3
page 4
page 5
page 6
page 7
page 8
page 9
page 10
page 11
page 12
page 13
page 14
page 15
page 16
page 17
page 18
page 19
page 20
page 21
page 22
page 23
page 24
page 25
page 26
page 27
page 28
page 29
page 30
page 31
page 32
page 33
page 34
page 35
page 36
page 37
page 38
page 39
page 40
page 41
page 42
page 43
page 44
page 45
page 46
page 47
page 48
page 49
page 50
page 51
page 52
page 53
page 54
page 55
page 56
page 57
page 58
page 59
page 60
page 61
page 62
page 63
page 64
page 65
page 66
page 67
page 68
page 69
page 70
page 71
page 72
page 73
page 74
page 75
page 76
page 77
page 78
page 79
page 80
page 81
page 82
page 83
page 84
page 85
page 86
page 87
page 88
page 89
page 90
page 91
page 92
page 93
page 94
page 95
page 96
page 97
page 98
page 99
page 100
page 101
page 102
page 103
page 104
page 105
page 106
page 107
page 108
page 109
page 110
page 111
page 112
page 113
page 114
page 115
page 116
page 117
page 118
page 119
page 120
page 121
page 122
page 123
page 124
page 125
page 126
page 127
page 128
page 129
page 130
page 131
page 132
page 133
page 134
page 135 page 136
page 137
page 138
page 139
page 140
page 141
page 142
page 143
page 144
page 145
page 146
page 147
page 148
page 149
page 150
page 151
page 152
page 153
page 154
page 155
page 156
page 157
page 158
page 159
page 160
page 161
page 162
page 163
page 164
page 165
page 166
page 167
page 168
page 169
page 170
page 171
page 172
page 173
page 174
page 175
page 176
page 177
page 178
page 179
page 180
page 181
page 182
page 183
page 184
page 185
< prev - next > Energy Hydro power civil_works_guidelines_for_micro_hydro (Printable PDF)
CIVIL WORKS GUIDELINES FOR MICRO-HYDROPOWER IN NEPAL
133
Box 9.1 Use of masonry grid to stabilise the jhankre mini-hydro powerhouse area slope
In order to increase the gross head of the Jhankre mini-hydro scheme, it was decided to excavate a 20 m depth at the power-house
area. This required stabilising the hill slope behind the powerhouse area. This area also had to drain ground water due to seepage
from the cultivated terraces (paddy fields) above. When irrigation water was provided for the paddy fields significant seepage was
observed at the powerhouse area. After considering various alternatives, it was decided to use a grid of masonry beams and
columns infilled with dry stone panels. Photographs 9.5 and 9.6 show the hillside during excavation and after the construction of the
masonry grid.
The hill slopes were first excavated at 2:1 to 3:1 slopes (V:H) with two intermediate berms along the hillslope and one at the sides.
Then the grid of stone masonry (in 1:4 cement: sand mortar) beams and columns with dry stone masonry infill panels was
constructed along the excavated slopes. The beams and columns are 500 mm wide and 300 mm deep. The distance between the
columns is 2 m and the vertical distance between the beams is 1.5 m (maximum). The dry stone infill saved the cost of cement and
facilitates drainage. Catch drains have been provided at the berm levels.
To date this 16 - 20 m high structure is stable. During the monsoon
ground water that has seeped from the paddy fields above can be
seen draining out from the weep holes and the dry stone panels.
Photo 9.5 Excavated slope at powerhouse
Photo 9.6 Masonry grid at powerhouse slope
9.6 Check dams and gully control
Gullies that are active or small streams where scouring of the
riverbed is prominent can be controlled by constructing check
dams. Check dams are small walls that prevent further erosion
on the watercourse and also allow deposition of bed load
upstream of it at a stable gradient. For small gullies that are
only active during the monsoon, the check dam could consist
of a simple dry stone wall. For small streams, bed erosion can
be controlled by using gabion check dams.
Gabion check dams have been used to control riverbed
scouring at the Jharkot micro-hydro scheme. The riverbed at
the Jharkot intake area had been scoured by more than 3 m at
some places and the scour depth was getting deeper. It was
felt that further scouring along the riverbed would cause total
failure of the existing gabion wall along the left bank of the
river. A series of gabion check dams was constructed at the
intake area to prevent further scouring and to facilitate the
deposition of bed load. The first check dam is shown in Fig-ure
9.4. Note that to prevent the gabion wires from being broken